当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >期刊拒绝修改后重投

期刊拒绝修改后重投

作者 hh_3629110
来源: 小木虫 550 11 举报帖子
+关注

投稿近两周后收到拒稿信,原因是文章创新不足(第一次被拒也是同样理由),同时拒绝修改后重投,这种情况表示什么呢?因为投稿文章水平实在太差么?求指导~~~拒稿信内容截取如下:
Your study yielded important results that are highly relevant for the management of groundwater resources in the area, but the manuscript does not contain sufficient novel elements to warrant publication in **. No new methods were applied, and nor were there outcomes that have a broader implications for our international audience. Without these elements, I can unfortunately not consider your manuscript for further review. I believe, however, that the work is of real value, so I respectfully suggest that you submit it to a more-appropriate journal.
According to ** policy, this decision means that you may not resubmit this manuscript to HJ in any form, even after making revisions, and you should not submit this or a revised version to HJ at a later time as a new manuscript. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • sesame_oil

    Your study yielded important results that are highly relevant for the management of groundwater resources in the area, but the manuscript does not contain sufficient novel elements to warrant publication in **. No new methods were applied, and nor were there outcomes that have a broader implications for our international audience. Without these elements, I can unfortunately not consider your manuscript for further review. I believe, however, that the work is of real value, so I respectfully suggest that you submit it to a more-appropriate journal.
    According to ** policy, this decision means that you may not resubmit this manuscript to HJ in any form, even after making revisions, and you should not submit this or a revised version to HJ at a later time as a new manuscript.


    拒稿了,即使你修改后也不能投稿了,作为新的稿件投稿到这个杂志也不行,说明你第一拒稿后没有好好修改,给你提出的意见没有好好看看,

  • hh_3629110

    引用回帖:
    9楼: Originally posted by sesame_oil at 2017-11-23 16:50:46
    Your study yielded important results that are highly relevant for the management of groundwater resources in the area, but the manuscript does not contain sufficient novel elements to warrant publica ...

    嗯嗯,谢谢。两次投稿不是在同一期刊,两次都是以创新不够被拒,没有给出具体的修改意见。只能再努力修改了!

猜你喜欢